The framing of charges in the Zubeen Garg death case is unlikely to take place at the next court hearing scheduled for January 17, according to Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) Ziaul Kamar. The senior advocate said the delay is due to the recent formation of the prosecution team and the large volume of case documents that still need careful examination.

Prosecution Team Needs Time to Study Case

Addressing the media, Kamar explained that the prosecution cannot move forward without fully understanding the case details. He said the team requires adequate time to review records before entering the charge-framing stage.

“The next hearing is fixed, but charge framing may not be possible as the prosecution team has only recently been constituted. We must study the case thoroughly,” he stated.

All Case Files Yet to Be Received

Kamar, who has recently assumed charge as the head of the prosecution, confirmed that not all case files have been received so far. He added that the process can begin only after the complete documentation is available.

He also noted that several bail petitions, including those linked to Amritprava Mahanta, are part of the ongoing proceedings and must be reviewed alongside the main case.

Massive Volume of Evidence Slows Process

Explaining the complexity, the SPP said the chargesheet alone exceeds 300 pages, supported by nearly 3,000 documents.

“Understanding the case requires a detailed review of every document. Only then can we proceed responsibly,” he said, adding that the prosecution must function strictly within legal boundaries.

Multiple Defence Lawyers Pose Structural Challenge

Kamar highlighted a procedural challenge, noting that each accused has a separate legal counsel, while the prosecution must present a single, unified case.

“This is not new for us. We have faced similar situations before and will handle this as well,” he assured.

Evidence More Important Than Adding Charges

On the issue of adding legal sections, Kamar cautioned against treating charge addition as a routine step.

“The real challenge is not adding sections but proving them with solid evidence. Arguments without material proof will not stand in court,” he said.

Pending Petitions Still Under Consideration

Kamar confirmed that he has reviewed the court order dated January 3, which indicates that several petitions are still pending. The district public prosecutor has also sought time to file objections, as recorded in the order.

“We can respond effectively only after reviewing the complete record. We will follow the court’s directions at the next hearing,” he said.

Experienced Prosecution Team in Place

Calling the responsibility given by the State government a serious one, Kamar said the prosecution team consists of six experienced advocates, all of whom are known for their legal expertise.

“We aim to move forward collectively, but this will require sustained focus and effort,” he added.

Informants Can Assist, Not Conduct Case

Clarifying the role of informants, Kamar said they are legally permitted to support the prosecution, but cannot conduct the case themselves.

“The proceedings must follow established legal procedure at every stage,” he concluded.

The case is expected to progress further once document-related issues are resolved and the prosecution completes its review ahead of the next hearing.